Taxes

Taken as a whole, the federal tax system is progressive—people with higher incomes tend to face higher tax rates.

How much of their income do different households pay in federal taxes?

Your total federal tax rate is how much of your income you pay in income, payroll, excise, and other taxes. While certain types of taxes taxes burden low- and middle-income households more than households at the top, the overall effect of the tax system is equalizing.

Income bracket
Tax rate
  1. Bottom 20%
    Bottom 20% households pay 6.4% of their income in federal taxes.
  2. Middle 20%
    Households in the middle 20% pay 13.0% of their income in federal taxes.
  3. Top 1%
    Top 1% households pay 29.8% of their income in federal taxes.What about the top 0.1%?
Where do I fit in?
$0/year Edit

Enter your household income to see where you fit in: Enter income

Source: Congressional Budget Office. Notes

Two of the most progressive taxes, the individual income tax and the corporate tax, account for a majority of federal tax revenue. But decades of corporate tax cuts and increases in payroll taxes, which are less progressive, have weakened the equalizing effect of the federal tax system.

Source: Congressional Budget Office. Notes

The share of federal revenue accounted for by more progressive sources has shrunk.

The corporate income tax is among the most-income-equalizing parts of the federal tax system. But it has shrunk in importance over time. It used to generate one-fifth of all federal revenue. Now it generates about 6%. At the same time, the payroll tax, which is not particularly progressive, has grown in importance.

Share of federal tax revenue, by source

Income tax Payroll tax Corporate
tax 
Excise tax Estate / gift Customs Miscellaneous
1962 45.7% 17.1% 20.6% 12.6% 2.0% 1.1% 0.8%
1963 44.7% 18.6% 20.3% 12.4% 2.0% 1.1% 1.0%
1964 43.2% 19.5% 20.9% 12.2% 2.1% 1.1% 1.0%
1965 41.8% 19.0% 21.8% 12.5% 2.3% 1.2% 1.4%
1966 42.4% 19.5% 23.0% 10.0% 2.3% 1.4% 1.4%
1967 41.3% 21.9% 22.8% 9.2% 2.0% 1.3% 1.4%
1968 44.9% 22.2% 18.7% 9.2% 2.0% 1.3% 1.6%
1969 46.7% 20.9% 19.6% 8.1% 1.9% 1.2% 1.6%
1970 46.9% 23.0% 17.0% 8.1% 1.9% 1.3% 1.8%
1971 46.1% 25.3% 14.3% 8.9% 2.0% 1.4% 2.1%
1972 45.7% 25.4% 15.5% 7.5% 2.6% 1.6% 1.8%
1973 44.7% 27.3% 15.7% 7.0% 2.1% 1.4% 1.7%
1974 45.2% 28.5% 14.7% 6.4% 1.9% 1.3% 2.0%
1975 43.9% 30.3% 14.6% 5.9% 1.7% 1.3% 2.4%
1976 44.2% 30.5% 13.9% 5.7% 1.7% 1.4% 2.7%
1977 44.3% 29.9% 15.4% 4.9% 2.1% 1.4% 1.8%
1978 45.3% 30.3% 15.0% 4.6% 1.3% 1.6% 1.9%
1979 47.0% 30.0% 14.2% 4.0% 1.2% 1.6% 2.0%
1980 47.2% 30.5% 12.5% 4.7% 1.2% 1.4% 2.5%
1981 47.7% 30.5% 10.2% 6.8% 1.1% 1.3% 2.3%
1982 48.2% 32.6% 8.0% 5.9% 1.3% 1.4% 2.6%
1983 48.1% 34.8% 6.2% 5.9% 1.0% 1.4% 2.6%
1984 44.8% 35.9% 8.5% 5.6% 0.9% 1.7% 2.6%
1985 45.6% 36.1% 8.4% 4.9% 0.9% 1.6% 2.5%
1986 45.4% 36.9% 8.2% 4.3% 0.9% 1.7% 2.6%
1987 46.0% 35.5% 9.8% 3.8% 0.9% 1.8% 2.3%
1988 44.1% 36.8% 10.4% 3.9% 0.8% 1.8% 2.2%
1989 45.0% 36.3% 10.4% 3.5% 0.9% 1.6% 2.3%
1990 45.2% 36.8% 9.1% 3.4% 1.1% 1.6% 2.7%
1991 44.3% 37.5% 9.3% 4.0% 1.1% 1.5% 2.2%
1992 43.6% 37.9% 9.2% 4.2% 1.0% 1.6% 2.5%
1993 44.2% 37.1% 10.2% 4.2% 1.1% 1.6% 1.7%
1994 43.1% 36.7% 11.2% 4.4% 1.2% 1.6% 1.8%
1995 43.7% 35.8% 11.6% 4.3% 1.1% 1.4% 2.1%
1996 45.2% 35.1% 11.8% 3.7% 1.2% 1.3% 1.8%
1997 46.7% 34.2% 11.5% 3.6% 1.3% 1.1% 1.6%
1998 48.1% 33.2% 11.0% 3.3% 1.4% 1.1% 1.9%
1999 48.1% 33.5% 10.1% 3.9% 1.5% 1.0% 1.9%
2000 49.6% 32.2% 10.2% 3.4% 1.4% 1.0% 2.1%
2001 49.9% 34.9% 7.6% 3.3% 1.4% 1.0% 1.9%
2002 46.3% 37.8% 8.0% 3.6% 1.4% 1.0% 1.8%
2003 44.5% 40.0% 7.4% 3.8% 1.2% 1.1% 1.9%
2004 43.0% 39.0% 10.1% 3.7% 1.3% 1.1% 1.7%
2005 43.1% 36.9% 12.9% 3.4% 1.1% 1.1% 1.5%
2006 43.4% 34.8% 14.7% 3.1% 1.2% 1.0% 1.9%
2007 45.3% 33.9% 14.4% 2.5% 1.0% 1.0% 1.9%
2008 45.4% 35.7% 12.1% 2.7% 1.1% 1.1% 2.0%
2009 43.5% 42.3% 6.6% 3.0% 1.1% 1.1% 2.5%
2010 41.5% 40.0% 8.9% 3.1% 0.9% 1.2% 4.5%
2011 47.4% 35.5% 7.9% 3.1% 0.3% 1.3% 4.5%
2012 46.2% 34.5% 9.9% 3.2% 0.6% 1.2% 4.4%
2013 47.4% 34.2% 9.9% 3.0% 0.7% 1.1% 3.7%
2014 46.2% 33.9% 10.6% 3.1% 0.6% 1.1% 4.5%
2015 47.4% 32.8% 10.6% 3.0% 0.6% 1.1% 4.5%
2016 47.3% 34.1% 9.2% 2.9% 0.7% 1.1% 4.8%
2017 47.9% 35.0% 9.0% 2.5% 0.7% 1.0% 3.9%
2018 50.6% 35.2% 6.1% 2.9% 0.7% 1.2% 3.4%
2019 49.6% 35.9% 6.6% 2.9% 0.5% 2.0% 2.4%
2020 47.0% 38.3% 6.2% 2.5% 0.5%  2.0% 3.4%
Created with Highcharts 4.0.345.7%47.0%17.1%38.3%20.6%6.2%12.6%2.5%IncometaxPayrolltaxCorporate taxMiscellaneousExcisetaxCustomsEstate /gift1/71960196519701975198019851990199520002005201020152020050100%
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Source: Congressional Budget Office.

Congressional Budget Office, The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2021 to 2031 (July 2021).

Copy the code below to embed this chart on your website.

Between 1979 and 2015, tax rates fell for all income groups.

Despite the shrinking share of federal revenue coming from progressive sources, the federal tax system overall is still a force for fighting inequality. The problem with that? We actually need a federal tax system that is becoming markedly more progressive to counteract any of the enormous rise in income inequality.

Average federal tax rates, by household income group

Bottom 20% 21–40th Middle 20% 61–80th Top 1%
1980 11.7% 15.8% 19.5% 21.7% 31.9%
1981 12.8% 16.4% 20.1% 22.2% 29.2%
1982 12.6% 15.3% 18.7% 20.6% 25.8%
1983 13.8% 15.2% 18.0% 20.1% 26.1%
1984 14.6% 16.0% 18.6% 20.2% 26.2%
1985 14.9% 16.0% 18.8% 20.4% 25.5%
1986 14.5% 16.1% 18.8% 20.5% 24.2%
1987 13.3% 15.4% 18.1% 20.3% 29.7%
1988 13.1% 15.7% 18.6% 20.7% 28.4%
1989 12.4% 15.5% 18.5% 20.6% 27.6%
1990 13.8% 16.2% 18.6% 20.6% 27.4%
1991 13.6% 15.8% 18.4% 20.3% 28.6%
1992 13.3% 15.6% 18.0% 20.1% 29.3%
1993 13.6% 15.5% 18.0% 20.1% 32.8%
1994 12.2% 15.2% 18.1% 20.4% 34.0%
1995 12.1% 15.4% 18.2% 20.4% 34.6%
1996 11.6% 15.3% 18.2% 20.3% 34.6%
1997 11.9% 15.5% 18.3% 20.4% 33.6%
1998 11.3% 14.9% 17.7% 20.3% 32.2%
1999 11.4% 15.0% 17.8% 20.4% 32.4%
2000 10.8% 15.0% 17.6% 20.4% 32.0%
2001 9.7% 13.3% 16.2% 19.0% 31.8%
2002 9.4% 12.7% 15.6% 18.2% 31.6%
2003 9.1% 11.8% 14.8% 17.5% 30.1%
2004 8.9% 12.1% 15.0% 17.6% 29.8%
2005 9.3% 12.1% 15.3% 18.0% 30.0%
2006 9.6% 12.4% 15.2% 18.0% 29.7%
2007 9.1% 12.7% 15.3% 17.7% 28.1%
2008 5.4% 9.4% 12.7% 15.7% 27.8%
2009 4.8% 9.0% 12.3% 15.2% 28.4%
2010 5.5% 9.3% 12.7% 15.5% 29.0%
2011 5.7% 9.2% 12.3% 15.3% 28.8%
2012 5.8% 9.4% 12.6% 15.6% 28.4%
2013 7.6% 11.0% 14.1% 17.1% 33.3%
2014 7.9% 11.1% 14.3% 17.5% 33.3%
2015 7.7% 11.1% 14.4% 17.6% 33.0%
2016 7.9% 11.3% 14.3% 17.4% 32.8%
2017 7.5% 11.1% 14.3% 17.4% 31.4%
2018 6.4% 9.8% 13.0% 16.3% 29.8%
Created with Highcharts 4.0.331.9%29.8%21.7%16.3%19.5%13.0%15.8%9.8%11.7%6.4%Top 1%61–80thMiddle20%21–40thBottom20%1/5025%5019801985199019952000200520102015
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Note: This tax rate is calculated by measuring how much in federal taxes you pay as a share of your pretax market income (earnings from work, capital gains, dividends, returns from owning a business, and rental income, after receiving benefits such as Social Security and unemployment payments). We rank households here by income after taxes and transfers.

Source: Congressional Budget Office, The Distribution of Household Income, 2018 (August 2020)

Supplemental data provided by the Congressional Budget Office with its release of The Distribution of Household Income, 2018 (August 2020). The tax rate is how much households pay in taxes as a share of pretax income (income after receiving benefits such as Social Security and unemployment payments but before paying taxes).

Copy the code below to embed this chart on your website.

The U.S. taxes much less than other rich countries.

The U.S. ranks near the bottom among its peers in tax revenue as a share of GDP. Even if spending rises as fast as projected in scenarios with rapid health care cost growth, by 2048 the United States would still need to raise only as much in taxes as several other rich countries raise today.

Tax revenue as a share of GDP

Country Tax revenue as share of GDP
Norway 58.1%
Denmark 53.0%
France 52.5%
Finland 52.2%
Belgium 50.2%
Sweden 49.9%
Austria 49.2%
Italy 47.1%
Germany 46.7%
Luxembourg 44.7%
Netherlands 43.7%
Slovenia 43.7%
Non-U.S. average 42.7%
Canada 42.3%
Iceland 41.9%
Czech Republic 41.7%
New Zealand 40.3%
Spain 39.2%
Estonia 39.0%
UK 38.8%
Japan 36.5%
Israel 36.0%
Lithuania 35.1%
Korea 34.9%
Australia 34.6%
Switzerland 34.1%
United States 31.5%
Ireland 25.1%
Created with Highcharts 4.0.358.1%53.0%52.5%52.2%50.2%49.9%49.2%47.1%46.7%44.7%43.7%43.7%42.7%42.3%41.9%41.7%40.3%39.2%39.0%38.8%36.5%36.0%35.1%34.9%34.6%34.1%31.5%25.1%NorwayDenmarkFranceFinlandBelgiumSwedenAustriaItalyGermanyLuxembourgNetherlandsSloveniaNon-U.S. averageCanadaIcelandCzech RepublicNew ZealandSpainEstoniaUKJapanIsraelLithuaniaKoreaAustraliaSwitzerlandUnited StatesIreland
ChartData Download data

The data below can be saved or copied directly into Excel.

Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), OECD.Stat online database, accessed April 2021. Data are for 2019. Total government revenue includes revenues accruing to all levels of government (for example local, state, and federal for the U.S.).

Copy the code below to embed this chart on your website.

Home

A nation’s taxes and spending reflect its priorities. But it can be difficult to understand those priorities—and to set them—without understanding the mechanics of taxation and spending. Use the Tax & Spending Explorer to see how our system really works.

Taxes

As a whole, federal taxes are an equalizing force. How do different taxes work, and whom do they impact the most?

Spending

The bulk of federal spending goes directly to individuals and families. How do these federal spending programs work?

State and local

Taxes at the state and local levels can make inequality worse. What goes into state and local taxes and budgets?

International

The U.S. spends less and taxes less than most of its peers. How does the U.S. rank, and what does that mean for poverty?