Scott

Net U.S. jobs displaced due to goods trade deficit with China, by congressional district, 2006–2013 (ranked by jobs supported by exports)

Rank State State district # Jobs supported by exports Jobs displaced by imports Net jobs  displaced District employment Jobs displaced as a share of employment
1 California 21 3,100 1,200 -1,900 243,800 -0.8%
2 California 20 2,100 4,800 2,700 302,500 0.9%
3 Nebraska 3 2,000 1,900 -100 305,600 0.0%
4 Washington 4 2,000 1,900 -100 284,500 0.0%
5 Iowa 4 1,900 2,700 800 382,300 0.2%
6 South Dakota Statewide 1,900 3,300 1,400 415,600 0.3%
7 California 16 1,800 1,500 -300 244,900 -0.1%
8 Minnesota 7 1,800 3,900 2,100 328,700 0.6%
9 Missouri 1 1,800 2,500 700 480,000 0.1%
10 Idaho 2 1,700 5,000 3,300 355,000 0.9%
11 Iowa 1 1,700 4,600 2,900 392,300 0.7%
12 Kansas 1 1,700 2,100 400 345,900 0.1%
13 Wisconsin 6 1,700 4,500 2,800 353,600 0.8%
14 California 26 1,600 4,600 3,000 325,900 0.9%
15 Indiana 2 1,600 4,000 2,400 317,800 0.8%
16 Indiana 3 1,600 4,800 3,200 327,000 1.0%
17 Michigan 10 1,600 4,100 2,500 308,700 0.8%
18 North Dakota Statewide 1,600 1,900 300 370,800 0.1%
19 Wisconsin 7 1,600 4,000 2,400 338,400 0.7%
20 Wisconsin 8 1,600 4,300 2,700 362,800 0.7%
Total* 357,600 1,787,600 1,430,000 140,399,600 1.0%

Note:  *Subcategory and overall totals may vary slightly due to rounding.

Source: Authors' analysis of U.S. Census Bureau (2013), U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC 2014), Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS 2014b), and BLS Employment Projections program (BLS-EP 2014a and 2014b). For a more detailed explanation of data sources and computations, see the appendix.

Copy the code below to embed this chart on your website.

Previous chart: «

Next chart: »