New census data show strong 2016 earnings growth across-the-board, with black and Hispanic workers seeing the fastest growth for second consecutive year
Today’s Census Bureau report on income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in 2016 shows that median household incomes for all race and ethnic groups increased between 2015 and 2016. Encouragingly, groups that, by and large, had seen the worst losses in the years since the Great Recession saw the biggest earnings gains for the second consecutive year. Real incomes increased 5.7 percent (from $37,365 to $39,490) among African Americans, 4.3 percent (from $45,719 to $47,675) among Hispanics, 4.2 percent (from $78,143 to $81,431) among Asians, and 2.0 percent (from $63,747 to $65,041) among non-Hispanic whites. The increase in incomes was statistically significant for all groups except Asians, resulting in some improvement of racial and ethnic income gaps between 2015 and 2016. The median black household earned just 61 cents for every dollar of income the white median household earned (up from 59 cents), while the median Hispanic household earned just 73 cents (up from 71 cents). Meanwhile, households headed by persons who are foreign-born saw an increase in incomes of 4.9 percent between 2015 and 2016 (from $52,956 to $55,559), compared to an increase of 3.3 percent (from $57,896 to $59,781) among households with a native-born household head.
Real median household income, by race and ethnicity, 2000–2016
Year | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian | White-imputed | Black-imputed | Hispanic-imputed | Asian-imputed | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000 | $63,589 | $41,349 | $46,229 | $65,836 | $42,217 | $44,789 | ||||||
2001 | $62,775 | $39,952 | $45,504 | $64,994 | $40,791 | $44,086 | ||||||
2002 | $62,583 | $38,732 | $44,173 | $70,224 | $64,795 | $39,545 | $42,797 | $75,793 | ||||
2003 | $62,340 | $38,681 | $43,055 | $72,677 | $64,543 | $39,493 | $41,714 | $78,440 | ||||
2004 | $62,147 | $38,240 | $43,546 | $73,067 | $64,344 | $39,043 | $42,190 | $78,861 | ||||
2005 | $62,427 | $37,933 | $44,213 | $75,101 | $64,633 | $38,729 | $42,836 | $81,056 | ||||
2006 | $62,417 | $38,063 | $44,983 | $76,484 | $64,622 | $38,862 | $43,582 | $82,549 | ||||
2007 | $63,576 | $39,261 | $44,775 | $76,521 | $65,822 | $40,085 | $43,380 | $82,589 | ||||
2008 | $61,906 | $38,147 | $42,266 | $73,173 | $64,093 | $38,947 | $40,949 | $78,975 | ||||
2009 | $60,929 | $36,454 | $42,557 | $73,244 | $63,082 | $37,219 | $41,231 | $79,052 | ||||
2010 | $59,948 | $35,361 | $41,423 | $70,735 | $62,067 | $36,103 | $40,133 | $76,344 | ||||
2011 | $59,130 | $34,392 | $41,216 | $69,499 | $61,220 | $35,113 | $39,932 | $75,011 | ||||
2012 | $59,599 | $34,835 | $40,777 | $71,754 | $61,705 | $35,566 | $39,507 | $77,444 | ||||
2013 | $60,036 | $35,647 | $42,205 | $69,098 | $62,158 | $36,395 | $40,890 | $74,577 | $62,158 | $36,395 | $40,890 | $74,577 |
2014 | $61,095 | $35,891 | $43,082 | $75,331 | ||||||||
2015 | $63,747 | $37,365 | $45,719 | $78,143 | ||||||||
2016 | 65041 | 39490 | 47675 | 81431 |
Note: CPS ASEC changed its methodology in 2013, hence the break in the series. Solid lines are actual CPS ASEC data; dashed lines denote historical values imputed by applying the new methodology to past income trends. White refers to non-Hispanic whites, black refers to blacks alone, Asian refers to Asians alone, and Hispanic refers to Hispanics of any race. Comparable data are not available prior to 2002 for Asians. Shaded areas denote recessions.
To account for the redesign of the CPS ASEC survey, when the difference between the original data for 2013 and the redesigned data for 2013 is small in magnitude (less than a 1 percent difference) and statistically insignificantly different, data for 2013 is an average of the original and redesigned data. When the difference between them is relatively large in magnitude (1 percent or greater) or statistically significantly different, we display a break in the series and impute the ratio between them to historical data.
Source: EPI analysis of Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement Historical Poverty Tables (Table H-5 and H-9)
Based on EPI’s imputed historical income values (see the note under Figure A for an explanation), real median household incomes for all groups, except Hispanics, remain below their 2007 levels. Compared to 2007, 2016, median household incomes are down 1.5 percent (-$595) for African Americans, 1.2 percent (-$781) for non-Hispanic whites and 1.4 percent (-$1,158) for Asians, but increased 9.9 percent ($4,295) for Hispanics. Asian households continue to have the highest median income, despite large income losses in the wake of the recession.
The primary driving force behind the slow return to pre-recession income levels has been stagnant wage growth. Real wages had been essentially flat since 2000, but wage growth received an added boost in 2015, as a result of low inflation. Relative to the pre-recession levels in 2007, 2016 real earnings of men working full-time, full-year are up for all race and ethnic groups—white men (4.8 percent), Hispanic men (17.9 percent), and black men (14.9 percent). As a result, the black-white and Hispanic-white male earnings gaps narrowed slightly. Black men earned 71 cents for every dollar earned by white men in 2016 (compared to 65 cents/dollar in 2007) and Hispanic men earned 66 cents on the dollar (compared to 58 cents/dollar in 2007).
Real earnings of full-time, full-year male workers, by race and ethnicity, 2000–2016
Year | White | Black | Hispanic |
---|---|---|---|
2000 | $76,675 | $50,717 | $43,900 |
2001 | $76,309 | $50,753 | $43,835 |
2002 | $76,803 | $51,916 | $45,619 |
2003 | $76,284 | $51,406 | $43,281 |
2004 | $75,886 | $49,158 | $44,060 |
2005 | $76,463 | $51,061 | $43,381 |
2006 | $75,912 | $50,785 | $43,759 |
2007 | $74,947 | $48,785 | $43,796 |
2008 | $75,990 | $50,764 | $44,631 |
2009 | $76,293 | $52,335 | $45,699 |
2010 | $76,153 | $50,183 | $45,446 |
2011 | $76,510 | $53,398 | $44,116 |
2012 | $76,144 | $50,884 | $45,004 |
2013 | $74,637 | $53,028 | $45,057 |
2014 | $75,140 | $52,963 | $45,001 |
2015 | $77,473 | $54,092 | $48,880 |
2016 | $78,577 | $56,076 | $51,633 |
Note: Earnings are wage and salary income. White refers to non-Hispanic whites, black refers to blacks alone, and Hispanic refers to Hispanics of any race. Asians are excluded from this figure due to the volatility of the series. Shaded areas denote recessions.
To account for the redesign of the CPS ASEC survey, when the difference between the original data for 2013 and the redesigned data for 2013 is small in magnitude (less than a 1 percent difference) and statistically insignificantly different, data for 2013 is an average of the original and redesigned data. When the difference between them is relatively large in magnitude (1 percent or greater) or statistically significantly different, we display a break in the series and impute the ratio between them to historical data.
Source: EPI analysis of Annual Social and Economic Supplement Historical Income Tables (Table PINC-07)
Among female workers, African American women received a sizable increase in 2015 earnings after experiencing losses every year between 2011 and 2014, but black women’s earnings changed little between 2015 and 2016. In 2016, black women’s earnings were up 0.6 percent since 2007, compared to 12.6 percent for non-Hispanic white women and 6.6 percent for Hispanic women. While white women’s earnings increased between 2015 and 2016, earnings among Hispanic women declined. In 2016, black women earned 79 cents for every dollar earned by white women (down from 88 cents/dollar in 2007) and Hispanic women earned 69 cents on the dollar (down from 72 cents/dollar in 2007).
Real earnings of full-time, full-year female workers, by race and ethnicity, 2000–2016
Year | White | Black | Hispanic |
---|---|---|---|
2000 | $48,463 | $39,282 | $35,232 |
2001 | $50,626 | $41,239 | $36,225 |
2002 | $50,436 | $42,158 | $36,202 |
2003 | $51,151 | $42,323 | $36,389 |
2004 | $50,972 | $41,153 | $36,304 |
2005 | $50,696 | $42,536 | $36,048 |
2006 | $52,218 | $43,557 | $36,726 |
2007 | $51,107 | $45,009 | $37,028 |
2008 | $51,077 | $41,205 | $36,644 |
2009 | $53,127 | $42,582 | $38,067 |
2010 | $52,876 | $43,316 | $37,468 |
2011 | $53,379 | $43,636 | $37,464 |
2012 | $53,123 | $42,291 | $36,911 |
2013 | $53,376 | $41,934 | $37,536 |
2014 | $53,028 | $41,059 | $37,774 |
2015 | $55,522 | $45,656 | $41,222 |
2016 | $57,559 | $45,261 | $39,472 |
Note: Earnings are wage and salary income. White refers to non-Hispanic whites, black refers to blacks alone, and Hispanic refers to Hispanics of any race. Asians are excluded from this figure due to the volatility of the series. Shaded areas denote recession
To account for the redesign of the CPS ASEC survey, when the difference between the original data for 2013 and the redesigned data for 2013 is small in magnitude (less than a 1 percent difference) and statistically insignificantly different, data for 2013 is an average of the original and redesigned data. When the difference between them is relatively large in magnitude (1 percent or greater) or statistically significantly different, we display a break in the series and impute the ratio between them to historical data.
Source: EPI analysis of Annual Social and Economic Supplement Historical Income Tables (Table PINC-07)
The 2016 poverty rates also reflect the income growth between 2015 and 2016. Poverty rates for all groups were down, but remain highest among African Americans (22 percent, down 2.1 percentage points), followed by Hispanics (19.4 percent, down 2.0 percentage points), Asians (10.1 percent, down 1.3 percentage points) and whites (8.8 percent, down 0.3 percentage point). African-American and Hispanic children continue to face the highest poverty rates—30.8 percent of African Americans and 26.6 percent of Hispanics under age 18 live below the poverty level—although these rates also improved between 2015 and 2016. Despite these improvements, African American children are 3 times more likely to be in poverty than white children.
Overall poverty rate and poverty rate of those under age 18, by race and ethnicity, 2013 – 2016
Overall | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 |
---|---|---|---|---|
White | 10.0% | 10.1% | 9.1% | 8.8% |
Black | 25.2% | 26.2% | 24.1% | 22.0% |
Hispanic | 24.7% | 23.6% | 21.4% | 19.4% |
Asian | 13.1% | 12.0% | 11.4% | 10.1% |
White | 13.4% | 12.3% | 12.1% | 10.8% |
Black | 33.7% | 37.1% | 32.9% | 30.8% |
Hispanic | 33.0% | 31.9% | 28.9% | 26.6% |
Asian | 14.7% | 14.0% | 12.3% | 11.1% |
Note: White refers to non-Hispanic whites, black refers to blacks alone, Asian refers to Asians alone, and Hispanic refers to Hispanics of any race.
Source: Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement Historical Poverty Tables (Table 3)
While today’s report provides a snapshot of the current economic condition of America’s largest racial and ethnic groups, Thursday’s release of the 2016 American Community Survey will provide an update on the Native American population and disaggregated data for the various ethnic groups that make up the Asian population.
Enjoyed this post?
Sign up for EPI's newsletter so you never miss our research and insights on ways to make the economy work better for everyone.